Domestic Violence: Yasir Qadhi Responds
Chaplain Yasir Qadhi recently delivered a khutbah in which he discussed marriage and the responsibilities of the husband and wife. Surprisingly, Chaplain Qadhi broke stride with the majority of neo-Islamic Imams by reminding women of their responsibilities in a marriage. We summarize important part of the khutbah below and bring up some relevant questions.
Chaplain Qadhi started off by quoting several beautiful verses of the Qur’an to remind us how having mates is one of His signs for He could just as easily have created us akin to amoebas in mode of reproduction.
Chaplain Qadhi then quoted the hadeeth:
عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، قَالَ: «إِنَّمَا الدُّنْيَا مَتَاعٌ، وَلَيْسَ مِنْ مَتَاعِ الدُّنْيَا شَيْءٌ أَفْضَلَ مِنَ الْمَرْأَةِ الصَّالِحَةِ
(سنن إبن ماجه رقم الحديث 1855)
Chaplain Qadhi translated the hadeeth as follows: “This whole world is nothing but pleasure and amusement and in this whole world the best mataa’ is a righteous spouse.
There was a subtle appeal to western equality of men and women in his translation because the actual translation of the last two words is “righteous wife” not “righteous spouse”. There is a significant difference in meaning and implication.
Then Chaplain Qadhi quoted and explained the linguistic precision and deep meaning of the beautiful ayah #21 from Soorah as-Rum {And among His Signs is this, that He created for you mates from among yourselves, that ye may dwell in tranquility with them, and He has put love and mercy between your (hearts): verily in that are Signs for those who reflect}.
Chaplain Qadhi then stated Islam has given men “one degree” over and above their wives. Then he sought to minimize it by saying “just one degree, that’s it” and gesticulating with his fingers an infinitesimal amount. At this juncture we must pose the question: When you say “just one degree” how do we know how large that degree is in the sight of Allah? We cannot minimize this as “just” one degree. Perhaps that one degree is as vast as the heavens and the Earth. We do not know. Chaplain Qadhi then sought to minimize this degree that men have over women by making a conditional statement as follows: “if there is to be a superiority men have just a slight bit more privilege than women”. We are behind you Chaplain Qadhi. Do not feel shy to beat your chest and say men have a privilege over women and a degree over women the vastness of which is known only to Allah but a degree above nonetheless. Do not feel like you are brow beaten into minimizing it by the abhorrent feminists.
Chaplain Qadhi then switched gears and to our delight stated “the man is the one who needs to be respected”. He preached that every man craves to be respected and that if respected he will return the respect with ultimate love and protection which is what the woman seeks. This was a bold and commendable point made by Chaplain Qadhi in today’s world of political correctness. Chaplain Qadhi went on to explain. If you respect men, they will become men for you. Part of that respect is the wife giving the husband his rights of intimacy. Turning down the husband when he wants sex is the height of disrespect stated Chaplain Qadhi. If the woman gives intimacy to the husband then he will overlook almost every fault of the wife. 95% of marital problems from the man’s perspective stems from the woman denying sexual intimacy stated Chaplain Qadhi. He went on to quote the two famous hadeeths of the “angels’ curse” and “prostration to husband if it were permitted”. The ultimate responsibility that a wife has is to respect her husband and not belittle him. Chaplain Qadhi recommended a book called ‘The Submissive Wife’. He did not mention the author and we found several books with that title. He might have meant ‘The Surrendered Wife’ by former self-confessed feminist shrew Laura Doyle who found happiness and joy in life when she defected from the religion of feminism and embraced her natural instincts of submissiveness.
Chaplain Qadhi then addressed men and asked them “if you don’t treat your wife with love, tenderness, and compassion how do you expect her to treat you with respect?” which to us sounded like the saying in discrete mathematics “to understand recursion you must understand recursion”. Before we fall into a dizzying infinite loop of who’s responsible for marital happiness we suggest that the women who are far deviated in today’s world from the natural instincts of submissiveness ought to start respecting men. Then the men will start loving them.
Then he told men “from your perspective the woman is not going to be straight”. We must disagree with the chaplain here. This is not men’s perspective. This was spoken by our Prophet (S) himself. So to be more precise the wording should have been “from every perspective the woman is not going to be straight”. He then exhorted men to overlook women’s faults and to be good to women as taught to us by our Messenger (S).
Chaplain Qadhi then addressed spousal abuse and domestic violence. He mentioned how the Prophet (S) allowed disciplining of wives at Umar’s (RA) request because the women had gotten bold. The Prophet (S) then stated in a khutbah that 50 women had come to him the next day complaining of being beaten and that the Prophet (S) stated to the gathered companions that these men were not the best of them and that he discouraged them from being physical with their wives. We say, notice this extremely important word “discouraged”. Not “forbade”, not “sinful”, not any of the words Muslim feminists use.
Chaplain Qadhi then switched on the feminist gears and said “Oh men, any man who beats his wife is not a man!” Right, so at this juncture we ask Chaplain Qadhi: what do you call the sahabi by the name of Abdur Rahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi (RA) who beat his wife until she had green bruises? Before you answer, kindly remember the judge in the case, narrated in Bukhari, was the Prophet (S) himself. Was Abdur Rahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi (RA) not a man? Were the 50 companions about whom complaints were received not men?
Chaplain Qadhi then addresses women: “If your husband is being physically abusive then get help from those who will help you. From extended family and friends. From society. From the people in the masjid”. Initially Chaplain Qadhi seemed to indicate that this advice applied to any woman being beaten but then seemed to indicate that it applies to those whose lives are being threatened. The demarcation is of critical practical importance and we hope the chaplain clarifies. Also, he needs to clarify what he means by “from society”. Does that include kuffaar sources such as policemen and kuffaar judges? Chaplain Qadhi needs to be extremely careful here in his clarification because women are emotional creatures and they’ll hop on to his words and call cops on their husbands even if their husbands are in the right such as when Abdur Rahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi (RA) was in the right when he beat his wife green with bruises. Chaplain Qadhi must be extremely careful here in his clarification because he may unleash social unrest amongst Muslims if he encourages rebellion of wives. The rebellion of the 50 wives was quickly quelled by the Prophet (S) when he indirectly criticized the 50 companions who beat their wives but of critical importance to note is that the Prophet (S) did not punish those 50 husbands nor did he say that they were not real men nor did he imprison them nor did he prosecute them nor did he turn them over to disbelieving authorities. Chaplain Qadhi therefore without mincing words must clearly address this issue so as not to foment an open rebellion by Muslim wives.
Chaplain Qadhi then stated that the Prophet (S) never raised his hand except fee sabeelillah. We say this is not entirely accurate. When Ayesha (RA) followed the Prophet (S) one night to Baqee’, upon his return he pushed her on the chest with his palm and Ayesha (RA) stated that the action caused her pain. So there is scope for pushing a wife on the chest with the open palm according to the Sunnah if she needs to be disciplined. Furthermore, Chaplain Qadhi did not address how two companions who were promised paradise, namely Umar (RA) and Abu Bakr (RA) hit women (their daughters) and they are also our role models to follow. In the incident of the lost necklace of Ayesha (RA), Abu Bakr (RA) was angered by her and he proceeded to hit her on the flanks till she experienced pain, as reported in Sahih Muslim. If Abu Bakr (RA) and Umar (RA) are our role models as we sunnis believe then how do we understand these examples of the sahabah?
Chaplain Qadhi then poses an intelligent question for men to ponder: “do you think being physical with them (i.e. hiting them) will bring about the respect you want?”. We agree. Gentleness is the best way to go and closer to piety. Question arises: can we ostracize brothers who resort to beating because they have precedence in the sahabah including elite sahabah?
Chaplain Qadhi then stated some truisms and axioms about marriage such as “to have marital problems is a part and parcel of being human. The goal is that there are more ups than downs. The successful marriage is the one in which there are more goods than bads not that there are no bads. Don’t just concentrate on the negatives.” He then proceeded to mention how to resolve marital disputes through arbitrators. Chaplain Qadhi then makes an important point by quoting an ayah that divorce should not be bitter or dirty and that it should be honourable and that a woman should be given a gift upon divorce. He did not address how women in the west take 50% of a man’s wealth and whether this is halaal or not. He then discusses the mechanism for divorce and the wisdom of the Sharee’ah in it.
Overall the khutbah was a refreshing departure from the standard fare we have become used to in the past decade where neo-Islamic Imams blame men for everything and put women on pedestals. The domestic violence portion was rather one-sided and not a complete treatment of the issue. There were a few important questions that were left unanswered, perhaps due to time constraints, and we hope he shall address them forthwith. We have mentioned those questions above.
The video of his khutbah may be viewed below:



This odious man is twisting hadith to suit his own women-hating agenda…pls do your own research do not follow a mysogynist who thinks rapists are 'lions' and dismisses true scholars and is too cowardly to post his real name let alone appear on videos to argue his points legitimately http://answering-christianity.com/karim/mistransl… http://projectsakinah.org/ResourcesTools/Videos/L…
السلام عليكم
Dear sister, we welcome your comments but please be constructive and refute the points instead of ad hominem attacks. We see you represent Project Sakinah which highlighted and praised Martin Luther King Jr recently on their fb page. MLK was known to be a womanizer and according to Rev. Ralph Abernathy he spent his last night in an orgy with three women one of whom he beat severely in the morning he was shot. It is bewildering that you associate yourself with that while you attack us! The FBI surveillance records covering his first night in Stockholm, Sweden, where he was to receive the Noble Peace Prize, document that his only interest was how to secure prostitutes for he and his entourage. An orgy followed. We promote our Prophet (S), not MLK or any other disbeliever. Please note we sympathize that you are a victim of DV. We do not compare rapists to lions as you have alleged. Rather we compare men to lions. Lions are beasts and if taunted with unclothed antelope meat they will pounce. There is a vast difference between your allegation and what we meant. Please stay on point and explain your issues with the hadeeth rather than make ad hominem attacks.
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
I read just now that is a myth that Abernathy said such a thing(apparently propagated by chain mails?).
Verify your sources always.
Rev Abernathy tried to explain away MLK Jr's womanizing later on. But refer to many sources talking about Martin Luther King Jr's infidelity and womanizing. Even his wife Coretta accepted his 'incidental couplings' which she considered as far below the high level relationship she enjoyed with him. Like many southern belles who stand by their men Coretta stood by him. Also refer to David Garrow's work on MLK Jr and his adultery, prostitution, womanizing, and beating of women is in plain sight for all. The FBI wiretaps recorded his multiple liaisons so it is a well known fact. MLK Jr's womanizing and woman beating was his business. The point was the sister was providing a link to an organization (Project Sakinah) that praised MLK Jr in their fb post and that is highly befuddling. Usually DV organizations do not associate with men who have any history of womanizing or woman beating.
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
I fear for you a great deal of regret if you do not give appropriate salams.
Yes, I am somewhat aware of that stuff with MLK.
I meant this sentence.
"according to Ralph Abernathy he spent his last night in an orgy with three women one of whom he beat severely in the morning he was shot."
وعليكم السلام و رحمة الله و بركاته
I find it amusing that you require other people to refrain from “attacks” and insist that they “prove” their points but have no problem declaring that a great deal of women lie and exaggerate about DV and rape, and claim that men who rape are just like “lions” who should not be condemned for going after a piece of meat (excellent choice of example, by the way, it really just goes to show that you view women as nothing more than objects) without backing it up with anything even resembling a credible source (hint: you won’t find one in this century).
Furthermore, I don’t see where any of these are ad hominems. An ad hominem attack is bringing up an IRRELEVANT detail unrelated to the argument to discredit someone. That you are a misogynistic twit is very relevant and also very true
Here you go. (Thank us later)
How our brains turn women into objects: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=…
A ground breaking research study from last year showing both men and women objectify women: How Our Brains See Men as People and Women as Body Parts: Both Genders Process Images of Men, Women Differently. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/1207…
http://answering-christianity.com/karim/mistransl…
http://www.quran434.com/wife-beating-islam.html
stop misleading people you anonymous coward.
Way to go, Muslim Spice! Another misogynistc article lauding the “superiority of men over women” and the “natural submissiveness” of women. Dear MS, methinks you have grown up in an environment devoid of good female role models. You are doing the Islamophobes a great service by playing into their hands with this odious article.
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
Brother, this ummah is wasat and we are commanded to have adl. I agree there has been an excessive push towards feminism and you seem to be going in the opposite extreme and this doesn't truly solve the problem.
"Ibn `Abbas and several others said that the Ayah refers to a beating that is not violent. Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that it means, a beating that is not severe." http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_conte…
Women will not be submissive in the face of patriarchy, violence and tyranny by men or other women. Allhamdulilah for women like Tawakkul Karman, Malala Yusufzai, Yasmine Mogahed, and the women at project Sakinah, whom I do not represent but I do support whole heartedly, as they help women while all a coward like you does is encourage violence against his own sisters and mothers. AstaghfiruAllah what a miserable soul you are!
Please keep up these great posts exposing what a hateful violent misogynistic religion Islam really is.
The world needs to open it's eyes to the truth about what Islam really teaches.
It's quite clear that your mind is not yet free. Rather it is shackled by your pre-concieved notions and lack of education. The most violent people by religion are Christians, then Buddists, then so on and so forth (based on number of humans killed in history by people belonging to certain religious groups). Muslims are not even in the top five most violent groups. Now, we suggest you read "Manufacturing Consent" by M.I.T. linguist Dr. Noam Chomsky which we hope will enlighten you.
The only wars prosecuted in the name of Christianity were the Crusades and the sectarian English civil wars where there is absolutely no comparison to the millions killed in the name of Islam over the last fourteen centuries. Any other wars were prosecuted by nation states regardless of their religions.
Do any rational people actually read idiots like Chomsky these days? Oops, I see you have, never mind.
Any stats to back that up Kiwi?
"Do any rational people actually read idiots like Chomsky these days? Oops, I see you have, never mind."
Looks like you have inadvertently said that MuslimSpice authors are rational. Perhaps you can go back to watching Fox News if Noam Chomsky is too much of an idiot for you.
Noam Chomsky? hahahahahahaha the biggest piece of garbage commie
Better him than Fox News.
one point- Umar and Abu Bakr(r.a) beat their wives? no, u said they hit(physically disciplined) their own child. what has that got to do with justifying domestic violence? physically disciplining and reprimanding ones child(male or female) has rules . Which scholar allows broken bones, bleeding, putting in a coma or death? just because you have people trying to say smacking your child is wrong don't go the opposite way of implicitly at least even if not intentionally making out the sahaba were in a habit of beating their daughters. if you don't agree with people like Yasir Qadhi at least give it from Scholars you do agree with instead of stuff without full context. Umar (r.a) buried his daughter alive, would u use that as a example as to raising daughters? or will you refer to hadith exhorting us to raise our daughters with love and being guaranteed jannah by performing that well.
your not trying to justify DV? then y mention something which is out of context. regarding Aisha(r.a) and that the whole army looked for her necklace, because she forced them or because the Prophet (saw) asked them to?
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
"Umar (r.a) buried his daughter alive, "
That hadith is weak.
Wa alaikumasalaam wa rahmatullahi wa brakathu. This is meant to b a discussion about DV to a certain extent. The above comment was an attempt to show discipline and abuse are two different things, also that daughters(children) n wife are also different so u shouldn’t use a reference to one thing and claim it justifies another. Instead of discussion , perhaps u had in mind rather to debate?
The aim should b to seek truth not to argue our point so we can feel we won inshallah .
Also we have heard this from many scholars about the life of Umar(r.a). When u say weak, who classified it as weak, u? Even if it was in sahih bukhari would it b an example of how we should behave? Let us not get distracted from the fact that is a rhetorical q. And stick to discussing the subject.
May Allah guide us, keep our intentions pure and unite our hearts and keep us away from spreading discord and disunity.
Assaamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
I do believe abuse and discipline are two different things.
I don't think Abu Bakr RA or Umar RA did any abuse.
The hadith is weak. It's irrelevent if some scholars propagate it.
"Even if it was in sahih bukhari would it b an example of how we should behave?"
Even if it did happen, and the hadith was not weak, it is an example of what Umar RA did before Islam not after.
We take from An-Nabi sallalllahualayhiwasalam and His Companions as the best examples.
U still haven’t said Who classified it as weak? N the point it was before Islam. U had to wait for me to say that if it was in bukhari before u thought of answering it that way? So whether weak or strong it wouldn’t b used as an example as it is known one worst of crimes to bury ha your daughter’s alive. This kind of discussion becomes long unnecessarily and I feel I am wasting my time.
remember to know the mistakes of your teacher sit with other than your teacher. And to believe one is always right is at the height of arrogance. I don’t know ur intentions so these Are just general statements. So mybrother let us think good of each other and pray for the unity of the ummah.
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
I actually don't understand any point you are making…I'm sure when you type it, it makes sense but when I read it, I have a hard time understanding what you are saying. Maybe if you wrote more clearly and spelled better we could actually communicate.
"I don't know ur intentions so these Are just general statements. So mybrother let us think good of each other and pray for the unity of the ummah."
They are general statements because I can't understand what you are saying. When you type, read it aloud to yourself and see if you could understand what you are saying before you submit your comment.
Since I probably have more experience typing on the internet, I don't need to reread my work before I submit it as much as you do to appear coherent.
In any case, I watch your back, you watch mine.
We haven't really had a meaningful conversation because I can't comprehend your statements. So I made general statements which I think might have addressed a point you might have been trying to make.
Yes, may Allah unite us in this world, and in the next.
ok lets say islamically speaking it is ok for a husband to beat his wife. can u describe a situation in which a husband should hit his wife? can he do it when ever he pleases? or is it only right in certain situations? and also is there ever a situation where the wife can beat the husband? i ask these questions so i can better understand your logic so please reply quickly (: